CPU
GPU
Core i5-2537M
Core 2 Extreme X7800
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2537M is positioned at rank 1217 and the Core 2 Extreme X7800 is on rank 1145, so the Core 2 Extreme X7800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2537M
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme X7800
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-2537M | Core 2 Extreme X7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom XE (2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-2537M | Core 2 Extreme X7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2537M and Core 2 Extreme X7800
Core i5-2537M
The Core i5-2537M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $250.
Core 2 Extreme X7800
The Core 2 Extreme X7800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 July 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom XE (2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,138 points. Launch price was $851.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2537M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Extreme X7800's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2537M versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X7800 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Extreme X7800 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-2537M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme X7800 uses Merom XE (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2537M scores 1,144 against the Core 2 Extreme X7800's 1,138 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-2537M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2537M vs 4 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Extreme X7800.
| Feature | Core i5-2537M | Core 2 Extreme X7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz+86% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 4 MB L2 Cache+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Merom XE (2007) |
| PassMark | 1,144 | 1,138 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 427 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 717 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2537M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Extreme X7800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i5-2537M versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Extreme X7800 — the Core i5-2537M supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-2537M supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i5-2537M) and Socket P (Core 2 Extreme X7800).
| Feature | Core i5-2537M | Core 2 Extreme X7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+66550% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 4 GB+26214300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 2 Extreme X7800 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-2537M) vs VT-x (Core 2 Extreme X7800). The Core i5-2537M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Extreme X7800 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2537M rivals Core i5-2410M.
| Feature | Core i5-2537M | Core 2 Extreme X7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-2537M and Core 2 Extreme X7800
