Core i5-3335S vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3335S vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3335S vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3335S

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 65W instead of 300W, a 235W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8452Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 68 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8452Y, which brings 36 cores / 72 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8452Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while Xeon Platinum 8452Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8452Y

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+1025% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 36 cores / 72 threads.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,641 vs 3,672).
❌361.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3335S better than Xeon Platinum 8452Y?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8452Y makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3335S is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3335S is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3335S is the better buy right now. Core i5-3335S comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8452Y is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 18.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8452Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA1155, and 1025% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 6 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-3335S vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3335S

The Core i5-3335S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,672 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon Platinum 8452Y

The Xeon Platinum 8452Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,641 points. Launch price was $3,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3335S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8452Y has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3335S versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8452Y — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-3335S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3335S scores 3,672 against the Xeon Platinum 8452Y's 3,641 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-3335S. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3335S vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	Core i5-3335S	Xeon Platinum 8452Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	36 / 72+800%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+35%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	67.5 MB+1025%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+700%
Process	22 nm	Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	3,672	3,641

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3335S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.