
Core i5-3550
Popular choices:

Core i5-7400T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-3550
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.6% HIGHER MSRP$194 MSRPvs$182 MSRP
- ❌120% higher power demand at 77W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7400T.
Core i5-7400T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 77W, a 42W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Core i5-3550 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-3550.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3550 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,692 vs 4,778).
Core i5-3550
2012Core i5-7400T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 77W, a 42W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Core i5-3550 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-3550.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.6% HIGHER MSRP$194 MSRPvs$182 MSRP
- ❌120% higher power demand at 77W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7400T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3550 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,692 vs 4,778).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3550 better than Core i5-7400T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3550 and Core i5-7400T

Core i5-3550
Core i5-3550
The Core i5-3550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,778 points. Launch price was $205.

Core i5-7400T
Core i5-7400T
The Core i5-7400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,692 points. Launch price was $187.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-3550 and Core i5-7400T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-3550 versus 3 GHz on the Core i5-7400T — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-3550 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-3550 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-7400T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3550 scores 4,778 against the Core i5-7400T's 4,692 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i5-3550. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+38% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 4,778+2% | 4,692 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,334 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,069 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,463 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3550 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7400T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-3550) / Yes (Core i5-7400T). The Core i5-7400T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-3550 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-3550 launched at $194 MSRP, while the Core i5-7400T debuted at $182. On MSRP ($194 vs $182), the Core i5-7400T is $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3550 delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 25.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-7400T — making the Core i5-7400T the 4.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $194 | $182-6% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6 | 25.8+5% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












