
Core i5-3550

Core i5-7400T
Core i5-3550 vs Core i5-7400T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3550 vs Core i5-7400T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3550 vs Core i5-7400T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3550
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.6% HIGHER MSRP$194 MSRPvs$182 MSRP
- ❌120% higher power demand at 77W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7400T.
Core i5-7400T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 77W, a 42W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Core i5-3550 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-3550.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3550 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,692 vs 4,778).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3550 better than Core i5-7400T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3550 vs Core i5-7400T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3550
The Core i5-3550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,778 points. Launch price was $205.

Core i5-7400T
The Core i5-7400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,692 points. Launch price was $187.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-3550 and Core i5-7400T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-3550 versus 3 GHz on the Core i5-7400T — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-3550 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-3550 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-7400T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3550 scores 4,778 against the Core i5-7400T's 4,692 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i5-3550. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+38% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 4,778+2% | 4,692 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,334 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,069 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,463 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3550 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7400T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-3550) / Yes (Core i5-7400T). The Core i5-7400T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-3550 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3550 was priced at $194, while the Core i5-7400T came in at $182. On launch pricing ($194 vs $182), Core i5-7400T was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3550 delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 25.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-7400T — making the Core i5-7400T the 4.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3550 | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $194 | $182-6% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6 | 25.8+5% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














