
Core i5-3570

FX-8140
Core i5-3570 vs FX-8140 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3570 vs FX-8140 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Warzone
Core i5-3570 vs FX-8140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3570
2012Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($194 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.4 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($194 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 77W instead of 95W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8140 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
FX-8140
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,860 vs 4,932).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 25.4 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).
- ❌23.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 77W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3570 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3570.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3570 better than FX-8140?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3570 vs FX-8140 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3570
The Core i5-3570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,932 points. Launch price was $231.

FX-8140
The FX-8140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,860 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3570 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8140 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8140 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-3570 versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-8140 — a 7.6% clock advantage for the FX-8140 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-3570 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-8140 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3570 scores 4,932 against the FX-8140's 4,860 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i5-3570. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3570 vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-8140.
| Feature | Core i5-3570 | FX-8140 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 8 MB+3100% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 4,932+1% | 4,860 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,780 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 741 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,246 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3570 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8140 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3570 | FX-8140 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3570) / not specified (FX-8140). The Core i5-3570 includes integrated graphics (HD 2500), while the FX-8140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-3570 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.
| Feature | Core i5-3570 | FX-8140 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD 2500 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3570 was priced at $194, while the FX-8140 came in at $225. On launch pricing ($194 vs $225), Core i5-3570 was $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3570 delivers 25.4 pts/$ vs 21.6 pts/$ for the FX-8140 — making the Core i5-3570 the 16.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3570 | FX-8140 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $194-14% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.4+18% | 21.6 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















