Core i5-4288U
VS
A12-9720P

Core i5-4288U vs A12-9720P

Intel

Core i5-4288U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A12-9720P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4288U is positioned at rank 1135 and the A12-9720P is on rank 1016, so the A12-9720P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4288U

#1123
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3776%
#1124
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3721%
#1125
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3416%
#1126
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3400%
#1127
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3369%
#1129
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3254%
#1130
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3120%
#1131
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3115%
#1132
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3031%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
100%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
99%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
99%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
98%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
97%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A12-9720P

#1004
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2238%
#1005
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2205%
#1006
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2024%
#1007
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2015%
#1008
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1997%
#1010
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1928%
#1011
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1849%
#1012
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1846%
#1013
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1796%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
100%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
99%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
99%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
97%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
95%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-4288U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A12-9720P in both compute-intensive tasks (1.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-4288UA12-9720P
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($342)
More affordable ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the A12-9720P holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $25 (vs $342), it costs 93% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 1249% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i5-4288U.
InsightCore i5-4288UA12-9720P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1249%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($342)
More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4288U and A12-9720P

Intel

Core i5-4288U

The Core i5-4288U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $342.

AMD

A12-9720P

The A12-9720P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,622 points. Launch price was $130.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4288U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A12-9720P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A12-9720P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4288U versus 3.6 GHz on the A12-9720P — a 14.9% clock advantage for the A12-9720P (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-4288U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the A12-9720P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4288U scores 2,659 against the A12-9720P's 2,622 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-4288U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 880 vs 529, a 49.8% lead for the Core i5-4288U that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureCore i5-4288UA12-9720P
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,659+1%
2,622
Geekbench 6 Single
880+66%
529
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4288U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A12-9720P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i5-4288U versus DDR4-1866 on the A12-9720P — the Core i5-4288U supports 199.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-4288U) vs 8 (A12-9720P) — the Core i5-4288U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-4288UA12-9720P
Socket
FCBGA1168
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L 1600 MHz
DDR4-1866+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12+50%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-4288U) vs AMD-V (A12-9720P). Both include integrated graphics Intel Iris Graphics 5100 (Core i5-4288U) and Radeon R7 (A12-9720P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4288U targets Mobile, A12-9720P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A12-9720P rivals Core i5-7200U.

FeatureCore i5-4288UA12-9720P
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-4288U launched at $342 MSRP, while the A12-9720P debuted at $200.

FeatureCore i5-4288UA12-9720P
MSRP
$342
$200-42%
Avg Price (30d)
$25
Release Date
2013
2016