Core i5-520UM vs PRO A6-8570

Core i5-520UM vs PRO A6-8570 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-520UM

2 / 4

1,943

+1.3%

1,919

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-520UM vs PRO A6-8570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-520UM vs PRO A6-8570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-520UM

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while PRO A6-8570 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

PRO A6-8570

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,919 vs 1,943).
❌261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-520UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-520UM better than PRO A6-8570?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A6-8570 is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-520UM pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-520UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-520UM still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-520UM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-8570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-520UM vs PRO A6-8570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-520UM

The Core i5-520UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.07 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,943 points. Launch price was $241.

PRO A6-8570

The PRO A6-8570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,919 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-520UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the PRO A6-8570's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Core i5-520UM versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A6-8570 — a 68.1% clock advantage for the PRO A6-8570 (base: 1.07 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-520UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A6-8570 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-520UM scores 1,943 against the PRO A6-8570's 1,919 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-520UM.

Feature	Core i5-520UM	PRO A6-8570
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz	3.8 GHz+103%
Base Clock	1.07 GHz	3.5 GHz+227%
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1024 kB+100%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	1,943+1%	1,919

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-520UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A6-8570 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-520UM	PRO A6-8570
Socket	BGA1288	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-520UM) / not specified (PRO A6-8570). The Core i5-520UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the PRO A6-8570 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-520UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400.