Core i5-5350U vs Xeon X3380

Intel

Core i5-5350U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X3380

95 WW2009
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-5350U vs Xeon X3380 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-5350U vs Xeon X3380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-5350U vs Xeon X3380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-5350U

2015

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 6000, while Xeon X3380 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $315 MSRP, while Xeon X3380 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Xeon X3380

2009

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,568 vs 2,589).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-5350U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-5350U better than Xeon X3380?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3380 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-5350U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-5350U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-5350U is the better buy right now. Core i5-5350U comes in at an unclear MSRP at $315 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X3380 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-5350U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-5350U vs Xeon X3380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-5350U

The Core i5-5350U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,589 points. Launch price was $315.

Intel

Xeon X3380

The Xeon X3380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.16 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,568 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-5350U is built on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-5350U scores 2,589 against the Xeon X3380's 2,568 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-5350U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-5350U vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3380.

FeatureCore i5-5350UXeon X3380
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.16 GHz+76%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
12 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark
2,589
2,568
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5350U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3380 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-5350UXeon X3380
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-5350U) / not specified (Xeon X3380). The Core i5-5350U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 6000), while the Xeon X3380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5350U targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-5350UXeon X3380
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 6000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile