Core i5-6500 vs Core i7-6822EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6500 vs Core i7-6822EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6500 vs Core i7-6822EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6500

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($239 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.4 vs 18.9 PassMark/$ ($239 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6822EQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6822EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-6822EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 530, while Core i5-6500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,550 vs 5,600).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.9 vs 23.4 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6500 better than Core i7-6822EQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-6822EQ is ahead with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6500 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Core i7-6822EQ also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6500 is the better buy right now. Core i5-6500 comes in $55 cheaper on MSRP at $239 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-6822EQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 24.1% better value on MSRP (23.4 vs 18.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6822EQ is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-6500 vs Core i7-6822EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6500

The Core i5-6500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,600 points. Launch price was $192.

Core i7-6822EQ

The Core i7-6822EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-6822EQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-6500 versus 2 GHz on the Core i7-6822EQ — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-6500. Both are built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-6500 scores 5,600 against the Core i7-6822EQ's 5,550 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-6500. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6500 vs 8 MB on the Core i7-6822EQ.

Feature	Core i5-6500	Core i7-6822EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	5,600	5,550
Geekbench 6 Single	—	684
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,796

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-6500) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-6822EQ). The Core i7-6822EQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Core i5-6500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6822EQ targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i5-6500	Core i7-6822EQ
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use	—	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-6500 was priced at $239, while the Core i7-6822EQ came in at $294. On launch pricing ($239 vs $294), Core i5-6500 was $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6500 delivers 23.4 pts/$ vs 18.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-6822EQ — making the Core i5-6500 the 21.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-6500	Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP	$239-19%	$294
Performance per Dollar	23.4+24%	18.9
Release Date	2015	2015

Search Core i5-6500 on Amazon

Search Core i7-6822EQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.