Core i5-680 vs Core i3-7102E
Core i5-680
Core i3-7102E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-680 is positioned at rank 1014 and the Core i3-7102E is on rank 974, so the Core i3-7102E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-680
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7102E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-680 | Core i3-7102E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-680 | Core i3-7102E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+706%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-680 and Core i3-7102E
Core i5-680
The Core i5-680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,620 points. Launch price was $272.
Core i3-7102E
The Core i3-7102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,599 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-680 and Core i3-7102E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.86 GHz on the Core i5-680 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-7102E — a 59.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-680. The Core i5-680 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-7102E uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-680 scores 2,620 against the Core i3-7102E's 2,599 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-680. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-680 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7102E.
| Feature | Core i5-680 | Core i3-7102E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.86 GHz+84% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,620 | 2,599 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 659 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-680 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7102E — the Core i3-7102E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7102E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-680 | Core i3-7102E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-680) vs Yes (Core i3-7102E). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Core i5-680) and Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7102E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-680 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-680 | Core i3-7102E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-680 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Core i3-7102E debuted at $225. At current prices ($10 vs $80), the Core i5-680 is $70 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-680 delivers 262.0 pts/$ vs 32.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-7102E — making the Core i5-680 the 155.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-680 | Core i3-7102E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294 | $225-23% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-88% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 262.0+706% | 32.5 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-680 and Core i3-7102E
