Core i5-8200Y
VS
Core i3-3210

Core i5-8200Y vs Core i3-3210

Intel

Core i5-8200Y

2 Cores4 Thrd5 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i3-3210

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-8200Y is positioned at rank 957 and the Core i3-3210 is on rank 814, so the Core i3-3210 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-8200Y

#944
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1829%
#945
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1802%
#946
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1655%
#947
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1647%
#948
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1632%
#950
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1576%
#951
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1511%
#952
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1509%
#953
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1468%
#957
Core i5-8200Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#958
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#959
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
99%
#962
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
98%
#967
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
96%
#969
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
95%
#970
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3210

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16363%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15461%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11226%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3382%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2679%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2344%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1342%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1325%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1206%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1206%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1193%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1160%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1144%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1140%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1129%
#814
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
100%
#815
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
100%
#816
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#817
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
99%
#818
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
99%
#819
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
98%
#820
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#821
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#822
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
97%
#823
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
97%
#824
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
97%
#826
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
97%
#827
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#828
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-8200Y (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-8200YCore i3-3210
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-3210 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-8200YCore i3-3210
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8200Y and Core i3-3210

Intel

Core i5-8200Y

The Core i5-8200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $291.

Intel

Core i3-3210

The Core i3-3210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,229 points. Launch price was $120.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-8200Y and Core i3-3210 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8200Y versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-3210 — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-8200Y (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-8200Y uses the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-3210 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8200Y scores 2,245 against the Core i3-3210's 2,229 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-8200Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 858 vs 505, a 51.8% lead for the Core i5-8200Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-8200Y vs 3072 kB (total) on the Core i3-3210.

FeatureCore i5-8200YCore i3-3210
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+22%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
3.2 GHz+146%
L3 Cache
4 MB+33%
3072 kB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,245
2,229
Geekbench 6 Single
858+70%
505
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,113
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8200Y uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3210 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR3-1866 memory speed. The Core i3-3210 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core i5-8200Y) vs 16 (Core i3-3210) — the Core i3-3210 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8200Y) and B75,H77 (Core i3-3210).

FeatureCore i5-8200YCore i3-3210
Socket
FCBGA1515
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
16+60%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8200Y) vs VT-x (Core i3-3210). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-8200Y) and HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3210) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1, Core i3-3210 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-8200Y rivals Athlon 300U; Core i3-3210 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.

FeatureCore i5-8200YCore i3-3210
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Tablet/2-in-1
Budget