
Core i5-8259U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 1400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-8259U
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Ryzen 5 1400
2017Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-8259U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,731 vs 7,843).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i5-8259U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Core i5-8259U
2018Ryzen 5 1400
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-8259U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,731 vs 7,843).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i5-8259U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-8259U better than Ryzen 5 1400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-8259U | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-8259U | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-8259U | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 181 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-8259U | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8259U and Ryzen 5 1400

Core i5-8259U
Core i5-8259U
The Core i5-8259U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,843 points. Launch price was $320.


Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400
The Ryzen 5 1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,731 points. Launch price was $169.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-8259U and Ryzen 5 1400 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-8259U versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1400 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-8259U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-8259U uses the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8259U scores 7,843 against the Ryzen 5 1400's 7,731 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-8259U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8259U vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1400.
| Feature | Core i5-8259U | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 7,843+1% | 7,731 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-8259U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-8259U | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












