Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen 3 2200G

Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen 3 2200G Performance Spectrum

Core i5-8305G

4 / 8

6,801

+1.0%

6,736

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen 3 2200G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen 3 2200G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-8305G

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 68.0 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Ryzen 3 2200G

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 250.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.0 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-8305G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,736 vs 6,801).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8305G better than Ryzen 3 2200G?

Yes. Core i5-8305G is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-8305G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8305G is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-8305G is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i5-8305G comes in 253.5% more expensive on MSRP at $350 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 2200G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,736 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 2200G is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen 3 2200G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8305G

The Core i5-8305G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,801 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 3 2200G

The Ryzen 3 2200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,736 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-8305G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 2200G's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-8305G versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2200G — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-8305G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-8305G uses the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2200G uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8305G scores 6,801 against the Ryzen 3 2200G's 6,736 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-8305G. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8305G vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2200G.

Feature	Core i5-8305G	Ryzen 3 2200G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake G (2018)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	6,801	6,736

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8305G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 2200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-8305G	Ryzen 3 2200G
Socket	FCBGA2270	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-8305G was priced at $350, while the Ryzen 3 2200G came in at $99. On launch pricing ($350 vs $99), Ryzen 3 2200G was $251 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-8305G delivers 19.4 pts/$ vs 68.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 2200G — making the Ryzen 3 2200G the 111.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-8305G	Ryzen 3 2200G
MSRP	$350	$99-72%
Performance per Dollar	19.4	68.0+251%
Release Date	2018	2018

Search Core i5-8305G on Amazon

Search Ryzen 3 2200G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.