Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Intel

Core i5-8305G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018

Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-8305G

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $200 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 130.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.8 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 6,801).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8305G better than Ryzen Embedded V1605B?
Yes. Core i5-8305G is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-8305G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8305G is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-8305G is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i5-8305G comes in 133.3% more expensive on MSRP at $350 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V1605B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.1% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-8305G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-8305G

The Core i5-8305G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,801 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-8305G and Ryzen Embedded V1605B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-8305G versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B β€” a 5.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-8305G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-8305G uses the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017βˆ’2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8305G scores 6,801 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 β€” a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-8305G. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8305G vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.

FeatureCore i5-8305GRyzen Embedded V1605B
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+6%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+40%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake G (2018)
Zen (2017βˆ’2020)
PassMark
6,801+1%
6,724
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8305G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-8305GRyzen Embedded V1605B
Socket
FCBGA2270
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-8305G was priced at $350, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B came in at $150. On launch pricing ($350 vs $150), Ryzen Embedded V1605B was $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-8305G delivers 19.4 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B β€” making the Ryzen Embedded V1605B the 79% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-8305GRyzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP
$350
$150-57%
Performance per Dollar
19.4
44.8+131%
Release Date
2018
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.