
Core i5-8500B
Popular choices:

Core i7-7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-8500B
2018Why buy it
- ✅+3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.4 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-7700.
Core i7-7700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i5-8500B.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,642 vs 8,900).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.8 vs 46.4 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
Core i5-8500B
2018Core i7-7700
2017Why buy it
- ✅+3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.4 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i5-8500B.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-7700.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,642 vs 8,900).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.8 vs 46.4 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-8500B better than Core i7-7700?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-8500B | Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-8500B | Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 129 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-8500B | Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 216 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-8500B | Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8500B and Core i7-7700

Core i5-8500B
Core i5-8500B
The Core i5-8500B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,900 points. Launch price was $192.

Core i7-7700
Core i7-7700
The Core i7-7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,642 points. Launch price was $303.
Processing Power
The Core i5-8500B packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i7-7700 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-8500B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-8500B versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-7700 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-8500B uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-7700 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8500B scores 8,900 against the Core i7-7700's 8,642 — a 2.9% lead for the Core i5-8500B. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-8500B vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700.
| Feature | Core i5-8500B | Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB (total)+13% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 8,900+3% | 8,642 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,435 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,364 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-8500B uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-7700 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,H370,Z370,Q370 (Core i5-8500B) and 100-series,200-series (Core i7-7700).
| Feature | Core i5-8500B | Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i5-8500B) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i7-7700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8500B targets Mini PC/Embedded, Core i7-7700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-8500B rivals Ryzen 5 2600; Core i7-7700 rivals Ryzen 5 1600.
| Feature | Core i5-8500B | Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Mini PC/Embedded | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-8500B launched at $192 MSRP, while the Core i7-7700 debuted at $272. On MSRP ($192 vs $272), the Core i5-8500B is $80 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-8500B delivers 46.4 pts/$ vs 31.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-7700 — making the Core i5-8500B the 37.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-8500B | Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-29% | $272 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.4+46% | 31.8 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












