
Core i5-9600KF
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1567
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-9600KF
2019Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,440 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 950.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1567, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Xeon D-1567
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,447 vs 10,646).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 9 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
Core i5-9600KF
2019Xeon D-1567
2016Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,440 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 950.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1567, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,447 vs 10,646).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 9 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-9600KF better than Xeon D-1567?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-9600KF | Xeon D-1567 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-9600KF | Xeon D-1567 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-9600KF | Xeon D-1567 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-9600KF | Xeon D-1567 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-9600KF and Xeon D-1567

Core i5-9600KF
Core i5-9600KF
The Core i5-9600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,646 points. Launch price was $262.

Xeon D-1567
Xeon D-1567
The Xeon D-1567 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,447 points. Launch price was $1,069.
Processing Power
The Core i5-9600KF packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon D-1567 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon D-1567 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-9600KF versus 2.7 GHz on the Xeon D-1567 — a 52.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-9600KF (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-9600KF uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-1567 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9600KF scores 10,646 against the Xeon D-1567's 10,447 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i5-9600KF. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9600KF vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1567.
| Feature | Core i5-9600KF | Xeon D-1567 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+70% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB (total)+500% | 1.5 MB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 10,646+2% | 10,447 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 7,301 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,600 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,200 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-9600KF uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1567 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-9600KF | Xeon D-1567 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1667 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9600KF) / not specified (Xeon D-1567). Primary use case: Core i5-9600KF targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-9600KF | Xeon D-1567 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-9600KF launched at $262 MSRP, while the Xeon D-1567 debuted at $2702. On MSRP ($262 vs $2702), the Core i5-9600KF is $2440 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-9600KF delivers 40.6 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1567 — making the Core i5-9600KF the 165.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-9600KF | Xeon D-1567 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $262-90% | $2702 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.6+941% | 3.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












