
Core i7-11850H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-11850H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 moves to FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11850H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,702 vs 19,873).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i7-11850H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i7-11850H
2021Ryzen 5 PRO 230
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 moves to FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11850H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,702 vs 19,873).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i7-11850H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-11850H better than Ryzen 5 PRO 230?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-11850H | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-11850H | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-11850H | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-11850H | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 381 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-11850H and Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Core i7-11850H
Core i7-11850H
The Core i7-11850H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,873 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-11850H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-11850H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11850H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-11850H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11850H scores 19,873 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 230's 19,702 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-11850H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,911 vs 2,320, a 19.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-11850H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230.
| Feature | Core i7-11850H | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 6 MB+380% |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,873 | 19,702 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,911 | 2,320+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,210 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-11850H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11850H versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM570,QM580,WM590 (Core i7-11850H) and Socket FP7 (Ryzen 5 PRO 230).
| Feature | Core i7-11850H | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11850H) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (Core i7-11850H) and Radeon 760M (Ryzen 5 PRO 230) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11850H targets Workstation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-11850H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.
| Feature | Core i7-11850H | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | Workstation Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











