
Core i7-12700
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 8945HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8945HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8945HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen 9 8945HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 21,568).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Core i7-12700
2022Ryzen 9 8945HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+25.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8945HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8945HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 21,568).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 8945HS better than Core i7-12700?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700 | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700 | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 205 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700 | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 623 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 683 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 544 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 357 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700 | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 751 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 740 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 740 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 730 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 572 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700 and Ryzen 9 8945HS

Core i7-12700
Core i7-12700
The Core i7-12700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,055 points. Launch price was $349.


Ryzen 9 8945HS
Ryzen 9 8945HS
The Ryzen 9 8945HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,584 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700 packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 8945HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-12700 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-12700 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8945HS — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945HS (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i7-12700 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 8945HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700 scores 30,055 against the Ryzen 9 8945HS's 29,584 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-12700. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,568 vs 17,200 (22.5% advantage for the Core i7-12700). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,497 vs 2,686, a 7.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 8945HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,448 vs 13,283 (6.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945HS). L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 8945HS.
| Feature | Core i7-12700 | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 4 GHz+90% |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+56% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 30,055+2% | 29,584 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,568+25% | 17,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,497 | 2,686+8% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,448 | 13,283+7% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 8945HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 8945HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i7-12700) and FP7,FP8 (Ryzen 9 8945HS).
| Feature | Core i7-12700 | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5x-7500, DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 8945HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 8945HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-12700) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 8945HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 8945HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12700 targets Gaming, Ryzen 9 8945HS targets Premium Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700 rivals Ryzen 7 5700X; Ryzen 9 8945HS rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | Core i7-12700 | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Premium Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












