
Core i7-3520M vs Celeron J4105

Core i7-3520M

Celeron J4105
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3520M is positioned at rank 1127 and the Celeron J4105 is on rank 900, so the Celeron J4105 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3520M
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4105
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-3520M | Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($346) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont Plus (2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-3520M | Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($346) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3520M and Celeron J4105

Core i7-3520M
The Core i7-3520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,842 points. Launch price was $346.

Celeron J4105
The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3520M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron J4105 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-3520M versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-3520M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i7-3520M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron J4105 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3520M scores 2,842 against the Celeron J4105's 2,820 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-3520M. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3520M vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4105.
| Feature | Core i7-3520M | Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+93% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4 MB (total)+1500% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Goldmont Plus (2017) |
| PassMark | 2,842 | 2,820 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3520M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4105 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-3520M versus 2400 on the Celeron J4105 — the Celeron J4105 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3520M supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 8 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-3520M) vs 6 (Celeron J4105) — the Core i7-3520M offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3520M) and BGA1090 (Celeron J4105).
| Feature | Core i7-3520M | Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | FCBGA1090 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | 2400+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32+300% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+167% | 6 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3520M) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4105) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3520M rivals AMD A10-5750M; Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.
| Feature | Core i7-3520M | Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















