Core i7-3615QM vs Xeon W-2102

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3615QM vs Xeon W-2102 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3615QM vs Xeon W-2102: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3615QM

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8.3 MB).

Xeon W-2102

2017

Why buy it

✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3615QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,098 vs 5,167).
❌Launch MSRP is still $202 MSRP, while Core i7-3615QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3615QM better than Xeon W-2102?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2102 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-3615QM is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3615QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3615QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3615QM is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-2102 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-3615QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $202 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-2102 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2102 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012) and 37.5% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-3615QM vs Xeon W-2102 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3615QM

The Core i7-3615QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,167 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon W-2102

The Xeon W-2102 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,098 points. Launch price was $202.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-3615QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon W-2102's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3615QM versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon W-2102 — a 12.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-3615QM (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-3615QM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W-2102 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3615QM scores 5,167 against the Xeon W-2102's 5,098 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-3615QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3615QM vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2102.

Feature	Core i7-3615QM	Xeon W-2102
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+14%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.9 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8.25 MB (total)+38%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	5,167+1%	5,098

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3615QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2102 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.