Core i7-3770 vs Opteron 6282 SE

Intel

Core i7-3770

4 Cores8 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Opteron 6282 SE

16 Cores16 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-3770 vs Opteron 6282 SE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3770 vs Opteron 6282 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3770 vs Opteron 6282 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3770

2012

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $725 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
  • Delivers 248.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6282 SE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6282 SE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6282 SE

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,385 vs 6,419).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($1,019 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3770 better than Opteron 6282 SE?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6282 SE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-3770 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-3770 is the better buy right now. Core i7-3770 comes in $725 cheaper on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $1,019 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6282 SE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 248.4% better value on MSRP (21.8 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3770 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 16/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3770 vs Opteron 6282 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-3770

The Core i7-3770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,419 points. Launch price was $294.

AMD

Opteron 6282 SE

The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3770 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6282 SE offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3770 versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-3770 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6282 SE uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770 scores 6,419 against the Opteron 6282 SE's 6,385 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-3770. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-3770Opteron 6282 SE
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+18%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+31%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB (per module)+700%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark
6,419
6,385
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3770 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6282 SE uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3770Opteron 6282 SE
Socket
LGA1155
G34
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-3770 was priced at $294, while the Opteron 6282 SE came in at $1019. On launch pricing ($294 vs $1019), Core i7-3770 was $725 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3770 delivers 21.8 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Opteron 6282 SE — making the Core i7-3770 the 110.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-3770Opteron 6282 SE
MSRP
$294-71%
$1019
Performance per Dollar
21.8+246%
6.3
Release Date
2012
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.