
Core i7-3820
Popular choices:

Core i7-4720HQ
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-3820
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $286 MSRP, while Core i7-4720HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌12900% higher power demand at 130W vs 1W.
Core i7-4720HQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 130W, a 129W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3820 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,714 vs 5,787).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
Core i7-3820
2012Core i7-4720HQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 130W, a 129W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $286 MSRP, while Core i7-4720HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌12900% higher power demand at 130W vs 1W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3820 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,714 vs 5,787).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3820 better than Core i7-4720HQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-3820 | Core i7-4720HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-3820 | Core i7-4720HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-3820 | Core i7-4720HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-3820 | Core i7-4720HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3820 and Core i7-4720HQ

Core i7-3820
Core i7-3820
The Core i7-3820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Fevereiro 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,787 points. Launch price was $400.

Core i7-4720HQ
Core i7-4720HQ
The Core i7-4720HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,714 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-3820 and Core i7-4720HQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3820 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4720HQ — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-3820 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-3820 uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4720HQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3820 scores 5,787 against the Core i7-4720HQ's 5,714 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-3820. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Core i7-3820 vs 6 MB on the Core i7-4720HQ.
| Feature | Core i7-3820 | Core i7-4720HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+6% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 10240 kB (total)+67% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,787+1% | 5,714 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 624 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3820 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-4720HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3820 | Core i7-4720HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | BGA1364 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3820) / not specified (Core i7-4720HQ). Primary use case: Core i7-3820 targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3820 rivals FX-8350.
| Feature | Core i7-3820 | Core i7-4720HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | HEDT Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













