Core i7-4770 vs Core i7-6820EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4770 vs Core i7-6820EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4770 vs Core i7-6820EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4770

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌86.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6820EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-6820EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 84W, a 39W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Core i7-4770 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,025 vs 7,055).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4770 better than Core i7-6820EQ?

Yes. Core i7-4770 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4770 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4770 is the better buy right now. Core i7-4770 comes in $75 cheaper on MSRP at $303 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 25.3% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 18.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6820EQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4770 vs Core i7-6820EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4770

The Core i7-4770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,055 points. Launch price was $500.

Core i7-6820EQ

The Core i7-6820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4770 and Core i7-6820EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4770 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-6820EQ — a 32.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4770. The Core i7-4770 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-6820EQ uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4770 scores 7,055 against the Core i7-6820EQ's 7,025 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-4770. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4770 vs 8 MB on the Core i7-6820EQ.

Feature	Core i7-4770	Core i7-6820EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+39%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	8 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	7,055	7,025

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4770) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-6820EQ). The Core i7-6820EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Core i7-4770 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6820EQ targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i7-4770	Core i7-6820EQ
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 530
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4770 was priced at $303, while the Core i7-6820EQ came in at $378. On launch pricing ($303 vs $378), Core i7-4770 was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770 delivers 23.3 pts/$ vs 18.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-6820EQ — making the Core i7-4770 the 22.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4770	Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP	$303-20%	$378
Performance per Dollar	23.3+25%	18.6
Release Date	2013	2015

Search Core i7-4770 on Amazon

Search Core i7-6820EQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.