
Core i7-4770
Popular choices:

Core i7-6820HK
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4770
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 45W.
Core i7-6820HK
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 84W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4770 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,012 vs 7,055).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
Core i7-4770
2013Core i7-6820HK
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 84W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4770 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,012 vs 7,055).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4770 better than Core i7-6820HK?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4770 | Core i7-6820HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4770 | Core i7-6820HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4770 | Core i7-6820HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4770 | Core i7-6820HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4770 and Core i7-6820HK

Core i7-4770
Core i7-4770
The Core i7-4770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,055 points. Launch price was $500.

Core i7-6820HK
Core i7-6820HK
The Core i7-6820HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,012 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-4770 and Core i7-6820HK share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4770 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6820HK — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4770 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-4770 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-6820HK uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4770 scores 7,055 against the Core i7-6820HK's 7,012 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-4770. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4770 vs 8 MB on the Core i7-6820HK.
| Feature | Core i7-4770 | Core i7-6820HK |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+8% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+26% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 7,055 | 7,012 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4770 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6820HK uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4770 | Core i7-6820HK |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-4770 launched at $303 MSRP, while the Core i7-6820HK debuted at $378. On MSRP ($303 vs $378), the Core i7-4770 is $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770 delivers 23.3 pts/$ vs 18.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-6820HK — making the Core i7-4770 the 22.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4770 | Core i7-6820HK |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $303-20% | $378 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3+25% | 18.6 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












