
Core i7-4770

Xeon W3680
Core i7-4770 vs Xeon W3680 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4770 vs Xeon W3680 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4770 vs Xeon W3680: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4770
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $291 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 84W instead of 130W, a 46W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3680, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon W3680
2010Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,025 vs 7,055).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ❌54.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 84W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4770 better than Xeon W3680?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4770 vs Xeon W3680 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4770
The Core i7-4770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,055 points. Launch price was $500.

Xeon W3680
The Xeon W3680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $350.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4770 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W3680 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4770 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3680 — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4770 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core i7-4770 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3680 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4770 scores 7,055 against the Xeon W3680's 7,025 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-4770. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4770 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3680.
| Feature | Core i7-4770 | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+8% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+2% | 3.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 12 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Gulftown (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 7,055 | 7,025 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4770 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4770 | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4770 was priced at $303, while the Xeon W3680 came in at $594. On launch pricing ($303 vs $594), Core i7-4770 was $291 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770 delivers 23.3 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W3680 — making the Core i7-4770 the 65.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4770 | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $303-49% | $594 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3+97% | 11.8 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














