
Core i7-4790K
Popular choices:

Core i7-10810U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4790K
2014Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-10810U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10810U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Core i7-10810U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌252% higher power demand at 88W vs 25W.
Core i7-10810U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 88W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,987 vs 8,063).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4790K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-4790K
2014Core i7-10810U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-10810U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 88W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10810U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Core i7-10810U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌252% higher power demand at 88W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,987 vs 8,063).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4790K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10810U better than Core i7-4790K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4790K | Core i7-10810U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4790K | Core i7-10810U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 109 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4790K | Core i7-10810U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4790K | Core i7-10810U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4790K and Core i7-10810U

Core i7-4790K
Core i7-4790K
The Core i7-4790K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Devil's Canyon architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 88 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,063 points. Launch price was $339.

Core i7-10810U
Core i7-10810U
The Core i7-10810U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,987 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4790K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-10810U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10810U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-4790K versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10810U — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-10810U (base: 4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i7-4790K uses the Devil's Canyon architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-10810U uses Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4790K scores 8,063 against the Core i7-10810U's 7,987 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-4790K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4790K vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10810U.
| Feature | Core i7-4790K | Core i7-10810U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+264% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Devil's Canyon | Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 8,063 | 7,987 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4790K uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10810U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4790K | Core i7-10810U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FCBGA1528 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
The Core i7-4790K includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-10810U requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-4790K | Core i7-10810U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












