Core i7-7700K vs Xeon E3-1285 v6

Intel

Core i7-7700K

4 Cores8 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1285 v6

4 Cores8 Thrd79 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-7700K vs Xeon E3-1285 v6 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7700K vs Xeon E3-1285 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7700K vs Xeon E3-1285 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7700K

2017

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $145 less on MSRP ($305 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Delivers 49.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.6 vs 21.1 PassMark/$ ($305 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 26.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 79W.

Xeon E3-1285 v6

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 79W instead of 100W, a 21W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (9,502 vs 9,625).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $305 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7700K better than Xeon E3-1285 v6?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1285 v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7700K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-7700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-7700K comes in $145 cheaper on MSRP at $305 MSRP versus $450 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 49.5% better value on MSRP (31.6 vs 21.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7700K vs Xeon E3-1285 v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-7700K

The Core i7-7700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 91 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,625 points. Launch price was $339.

Intel

Xeon E3-1285 v6

The Xeon E3-1285 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-DT (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 79 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,502 points. Launch price was $450.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7700K and Xeon E3-1285 v6 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-7700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v6 — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.2 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i7-7700K uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1285 v6 uses Kaby Lake-DT (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700K scores 9,625 against the Xeon E3-1285 v6's 9,502 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-7700K. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-7700KXeon E3-1285 v6
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
4.2 GHz+2%
4.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Kaby Lake-DT (2017)
PassMark
9,625+1%
9,502
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCore i7-7700KXeon E3-1285 v6
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-7700K was priced at $305, while the Xeon E3-1285 v6 came in at $450. On launch pricing ($305 vs $450), Core i7-7700K was $145 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7700K delivers 31.6 pts/$ vs 21.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1285 v6 — making the Core i7-7700K the 39.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-7700KXeon E3-1285 v6
MSRP
$305-32%
$450
Performance per Dollar
31.6+50%
21.1
Release Date
2017
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.