
Core i9-10900K

Core i9-10900KF
Core i9-10900K vs Core i9-10900KF Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10900K vs Core i9-10900KF FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10900K vs Core i9-10900KF: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10900K
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $509 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-10900KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i9-10900KF
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,231 vs 22,382).
- ❌2% HIGHER MSRP$509 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10900K better than Core i9-10900KF?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10900K vs Core i9-10900KF Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900K
The Core i9-10900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,382 points. Launch price was $488.

Core i9-10900KF
The Core i9-10900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,231 points. Launch price was $509.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-10900K and Core i9-10900KF share an identical 10-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900K versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900KF — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). Both are built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i9-10900K scores 22,382 against the Core i9-10900KF's 22,231 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-10900K. Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,382 | 22,231 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,767 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,261 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 400 series (Core i9-10900K) and LGA1200 (Core i9-10900KF).
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-10900K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-10900KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-10900K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10900K was priced at $499, while the Core i9-10900KF came in at $509. On launch pricing ($499 vs $509), Core i9-10900K was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900K delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 43.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900KF — making the Core i9-10900K the 2.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-2% | $509 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+3% | 43.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














