Core i9-10900K vs Core i9-10900KF

Intel

Core i9-10900K

10 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i9-10900KF

10 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-10900K

2020

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $10 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $509 MSRP).
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-10900KF needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900KF across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i9-10900KF

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,231 vs 22,382).
  • 2% HIGHER MSRP
    $509 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10900K better than Core i9-10900KF?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i9-10900KF is ahead with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10900K pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10900K is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-10900K is the smarter buy today. Core i9-10900K is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $509 MSRP, and it gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i9-10900KF is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.7% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 43.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10900K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KF
1080p
low263 FPS280 FPS
medium242 FPS247 FPS
high202 FPS207 FPS
ultra174 FPS178 FPS
1440p
low227 FPS241 FPS
medium189 FPS190 FPS
high154 FPS156 FPS
ultra136 FPS137 FPS
4K
low157 FPS167 FPS
medium131 FPS133 FPS
high102 FPS103 FPS
ultra89 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KF
1080p
low560 FPS556 FPS
medium487 FPS523 FPS
high411 FPS429 FPS
ultra375 FPS386 FPS
1440p
low497 FPS556 FPS
medium436 FPS475 FPS
high369 FPS391 FPS
ultra321 FPS335 FPS
4K
low291 FPS338 FPS
medium259 FPS285 FPS
high247 FPS265 FPS
ultra215 FPS229 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KF
1080p
low560 FPS556 FPS
medium560 FPS556 FPS
high517 FPS556 FPS
ultra426 FPS556 FPS
1440p
low560 FPS556 FPS
medium546 FPS556 FPS
high464 FPS556 FPS
ultra387 FPS492 FPS
4K
low473 FPS556 FPS
medium407 FPS496 FPS
high363 FPS445 FPS
ultra299 FPS374 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KF
1080p
low560 FPS556 FPS
medium560 FPS556 FPS
high560 FPS556 FPS
ultra560 FPS556 FPS
1440p
low560 FPS556 FPS
medium560 FPS556 FPS
high560 FPS556 FPS
ultra540 FPS556 FPS
4K
low539 FPS556 FPS
medium490 FPS556 FPS
high438 FPS510 FPS
ultra383 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900K and Core i9-10900KF

Intel

Core i9-10900K

The Core i9-10900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,382 points. Launch price was $488.

Intel

Core i9-10900KF

The Core i9-10900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,231 points. Launch price was $509.

Processing Power

Both the Core i9-10900K and Core i9-10900KF share an identical 10-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900K versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900KF — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). Both are built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i9-10900K scores 22,382 against the Core i9-10900KF's 22,231 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-10900K. Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KF
Cores / Threads
10 / 20
10 / 20
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
22,382
22,231
Geekbench 6 Single
1,767
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,261
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 400 series (Core i9-10900K) and LGA1200 (Core i9-10900KF).

FeatureCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KF
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-10900K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-10900KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-10900K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KF
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-10900K launched at $499 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900KF debuted at $509. On MSRP ($499 vs $509), the Core i9-10900K is $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900K delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 43.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900KF — making the Core i9-10900K the 2.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KF
MSRP
$499-2%
$509
Performance per Dollar
44.9+3%
43.7
Release Date
2020
2020