
Core i9-10900K
Popular choices:

Core i9-10900KF
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10900K
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $509 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-10900KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900KF across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i9-10900KF
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,231 vs 22,382).
- ❌2% HIGHER MSRP$509 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-10900K
2020Core i9-10900KF
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $509 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-10900KF needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900KF across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,231 vs 22,382).
- ❌2% HIGHER MSRP$509 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10900K better than Core i9-10900KF?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 335 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 517 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 473 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 374 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 540 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900K and Core i9-10900KF

Core i9-10900K
Core i9-10900K
The Core i9-10900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,382 points. Launch price was $488.

Core i9-10900KF
Core i9-10900KF
The Core i9-10900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,231 points. Launch price was $509.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-10900K and Core i9-10900KF share an identical 10-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900K versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900KF — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). Both are built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i9-10900K scores 22,382 against the Core i9-10900KF's 22,231 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-10900K. Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,382 | 22,231 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,767 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,261 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 400 series (Core i9-10900K) and LGA1200 (Core i9-10900KF).
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-10900K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-10900KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-10900K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10900K launched at $499 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900KF debuted at $509. On MSRP ($499 vs $509), the Core i9-10900K is $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900K delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 43.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900KF — making the Core i9-10900K the 2.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-2% | $509 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+3% | 43.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












