Core i9-13900KF
EPYC 8324P
Core i9-13900KF vs EPYC 8324P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900KF vs EPYC 8324P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900KF vs EPYC 8324P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900KF
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,296 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 219.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.4 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
EPYC 8324P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅380% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,127 vs 57,743).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 96.4 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900KF better than EPYC 8324P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900KF vs EPYC 8324P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-13900KF
The Core i9-13900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 W, 253 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,743 points. Launch price was $564.
EPYC 8324P
The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900KF packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 8324P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-13900KF versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P — a 62.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KF (base: 3 GHz vs 2.65 GHz). The Core i9-13900KF uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 8324P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900KF scores 57,743 against the EPYC 8324P's 57,127 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i9-13900KF. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KF vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KF | EPYC 8324P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+90% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+13% | 2.65 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 57,743+1% | 57,127 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 39,565 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,946 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,878 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 8324P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900KF versus 4800 on the EPYC 8324P — the Core i9-13900KF supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8324P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900KF) vs 6 (EPYC 8324P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900KF) vs 96 (EPYC 8324P) — the EPYC 8324P offers 76 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel Z690 (Core i9-13900KF) and SP6 (EPYC 8324P).
| Feature | Core i9-13900KF | EPYC 8324P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+17% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 1152 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 96+380% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13900KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8324P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-13900KF) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8324P). Primary use case: Core i9-13900KF targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KF | EPYC 8324P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13900KF was priced at $599, while the EPYC 8324P came in at $1895. On launch pricing ($599 vs $1895), Core i9-13900KF was $1296 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900KF delivers 96.4 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 8324P — making the Core i9-13900KF the 104.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KF | EPYC 8324P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-68% | $1895 |
| Performance per Dollar | 96.4+220% | 30.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-13900KF and EPYC 8324P
