Core i9-14900KS
EPYC 7513
Core i9-14900KS vs EPYC 7513 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-14900KS vs EPYC 7513 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-14900KS vs EPYC 7513: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-14900KS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,091 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 284.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.8 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7513, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7513
2021Why buy it
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900KS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (59,745 vs 60,531).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 80.8 PassMark/$ ($2,840 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900KS moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900KS better than EPYC 7513?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-14900KS vs EPYC 7513 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-14900KS
The Core i9-14900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Marchar 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.9 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,531 points. Launch price was $689.
EPYC 7513
The EPYC 7513 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.65 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,745 points. Launch price was $2,840.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900KS packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7513 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7513 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.9 GHz on the Core i9-14900KS versus 3.65 GHz on the EPYC 7513 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900KS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i9-14900KS uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7513 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900KS scores 60,531 against the EPYC 7513's 59,745 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i9-14900KS. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900KS vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7513.
| Feature | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.9 GHz+62% | 3.65 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+23% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 60,531+1% | 59,745 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7513 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-14900KS versus 3200 on the EPYC 7513 — the Core i9-14900KS supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7513 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14900KS) vs 8 (EPYC 7513). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900KS) vs 128 (EPYC 7513) — the EPYC 7513 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,Z690 (Core i9-14900KS) and SP3 (EPYC 7513).
| Feature | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-14900KS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-14900KS includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7513 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 7513 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-14900KS was priced at $749, while the EPYC 7513 came in at $2840. On launch pricing ($749 vs $2840), Core i9-14900KS was $2091 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900KS delivers 80.8 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 7513 — making the Core i9-14900KS the 117.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900KS | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749-74% | $2840 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.8+285% | 21.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-14900KS and EPYC 7513
