Core i9-7940X vs Ryzen 7 8840HS

Core i9-7940X vs Ryzen 7 8840HS Performance Spectrum

Core i9-7940X

14 / 28

25,452

+1.2%

25,156

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-7940X vs Ryzen 7 8840HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-7940X vs Ryzen 7 8840HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-7940X

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,399 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌489.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 165W, a 137W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,156 vs 25,452).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8840HS better than Core i9-7940X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 8840HS is ahead with a 31.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-7940X pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Core i9-7940X also has the bigger cache pool with 20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-7940X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8840HS is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 7 8840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,399 MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-7940X only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (18.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2066.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8840HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-7940X vs Ryzen 7 8840HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-7940X

The Core i9-7940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 25,452 points. Launch price was $1,399.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-7940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7940X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7940X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-7940X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7940X scores 25,452 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i9-7940X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-7940X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.

Feature	Core i9-7940X	Ryzen 7 8840HS
Cores / Threads	14 / 28+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.3 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	19.25 MB (total)+20%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,452+1%	25,156

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-7940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.