Core i9-9900KS vs Xeon D-2752TER

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-9900KS vs Xeon D-2752TER FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-9900KS vs Xeon D-2752TER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-9900KS

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2752TER, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $513 MSRP, while Xeon D-2752TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌64.9% higher power demand at 127W vs 77W.

Xeon D-2752TER

2022

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
✅Draws 77W instead of 127W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900KS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,074 vs 19,397).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-9900KS better than Xeon D-2752TER?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-2752TER makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-9900KS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-9900KS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 32.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-9900KS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-9900KS is the better buy right now. Core i9-9900KS comes in at an unclear MSRP at $513 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 32.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2752TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-9900KS vs Xeon D-2752TER Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9900KS

The Core i9-9900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 127 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,397 points. Launch price was $513.

Xeon D-2752TER

The Xeon D-2752TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,074 points. Launch price was $1,061.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-9900KS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2752TER offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon D-2752TER has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900KS versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon D-2752TER — a 56.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900KS (base: 4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i9-9900KS uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-2752TER uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900KS scores 19,397 against the Xeon D-2752TER's 19,074 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i9-9900KS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900KS vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2752TER.

Feature	Core i9-9900KS	Xeon D-2752TER
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+79%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+122%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	19,397+2%	19,074

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-9900KS uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2752TER uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.