PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-9960X vs Xeon Gold 6248 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-9960X vs Xeon Gold 6248: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-9960X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,700 vs 15,277).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 28 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6248, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,684 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6248 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6248

2019

Why buy it

✅+42.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 44.
✅Draws 150W instead of 165W, a 15W reduction.
✅9.1% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 44) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6248 better than Core i9-9960X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6248 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-9960X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6248 is the stronger fit. You are getting 42.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6248 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon Gold 6248 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,684 MSRP, and it still gives you 42.8% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i9-9960X only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (17.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2066.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6248 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018), 25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-9960X vs Xeon Gold 6248 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9960X

The Core i9-9960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,927 points. Launch price was $1,684.

Xeon Gold 6248

The Xeon Gold 6248 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,535 points. Launch price was $3,072.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-9960X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6248 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9960X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-9960X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i9-9960X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6248 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9960X scores 29,927 against the Xeon Gold 6248's 29,535 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i9-9960X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,650 vs 1,327, a 21.7% lead for the Core i9-9960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,700 vs 15,277 (35.2% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). L3 cache: 22 MB (total) on the Core i9-9960X vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248.

Feature	Core i9-9960X	Xeon Gold 6248
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	20 / 40+25%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+15%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+24%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	22 MB (total)	27.5 MB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	20 MB+1900%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	29,927+1%	29,535
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	19,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,650+24%	1,327
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,700	15,277+43%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-9960X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6248 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9960X versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6248 — the Xeon Gold 6248 supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6248 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9960X) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6248). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9960X) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6248) — the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9960X) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6248).

Feature	Core i9-9960X	Xeon Gold 6248
Socket	LGA2066	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	4	6+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	44	48+9%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-9960X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9960X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6248). Primary use case: Core i9-9960X targets HEDT, Xeon Gold 6248 targets General Purpose Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6248 rivals EPYC 7352.