Core M-5Y10c vs Athlon II P340
Core M-5Y10c
Athlon II P340
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core M-5Y10c is positioned at rank #1166 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y10c
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core M-5Y10c | Athlon II P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core M-5Y10c | Athlon II P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2694%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y10c and Athlon II P340
Core M-5Y10c
The Core M-5Y10c is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $281.
Athlon II P340
The Athlon II P340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,895 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core M-5Y10c packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon II P340's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10c versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II P340 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II P340. The Core M-5Y10c uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon II P340 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y10c scores 1,906 against the Athlon II P340's 1,895 — a 0.6% lead for the Core M-5Y10c.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10c | Athlon II P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 0.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-Y (2014) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,906 | 1,895 |
Memory & Platform
The Core M-5Y10c uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II P340 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1600 on the Core M-5Y10c versus 1066 on the Athlon II P340 — the Athlon II P340 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core M-5Y10c supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core M-5Y10c) vs 0 (Athlon II P340) — the Core M-5Y10c offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10c | Athlon II P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | S1g4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1600 | 1066+35433% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+209715100% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core M-5Y10c) vs true (Athlon II P340). The Core M-5Y10c includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 5300), while the Athlon II P340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core M-5Y10c targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Athlon II P340 rivals Pentium P6000.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10c | Athlon II P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 5300 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
The Core M-5Y10c launched at $281 MSRP, while the Athlon II P340 debuted at $0. At current prices ($281 vs $10), the Athlon II P340 is $271 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y10c delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 189.5 pts/$ for the Athlon II P340 — making the Athlon II P340 the 186.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10c | Athlon II P340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281 | $10-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 189.5+2687% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core M-5Y10c and Athlon II P340
