Core M-5Y10c
VS
Core i5-560M

Core M-5Y10c vs Core i5-560M

Intel

Core M-5Y10c

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-560M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core M-5Y10c is positioned at rank 1166 and the Core i5-560M is on rank 1121, so the Core i5-560M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y10c

#1152
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4327%
#1153
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4264%
#1154
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3914%
#1155
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3897%
#1156
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3861%
#1158
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3729%
#1159
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3575%
#1160
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3569%
#1161
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3473%
#1164
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1165
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
100%
#1166
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1168
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1169
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1170
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1171
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1172
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
98%
#1174
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
96%
#1175
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1176
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1177
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
95%
#1178
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
95%
#1179
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-560M

#1109
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3485%
#1110
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3433%
#1111
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3152%
#1112
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3138%
#1113
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3109%
#1115
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3002%
#1116
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2879%
#1117
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2874%
#1118
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2797%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
98%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
98%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1129
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
98%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
97%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
97%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
96%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
92%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-560M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core M-5Y10c is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore M-5Y10cCore i5-560M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($225)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-560M stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 20% cheaper ($225 vs $281) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore M-5Y10cCore i5-560M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+24%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($225)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y10c and Core i5-560M

Intel

Core M-5Y10c

The Core M-5Y10c is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core i5-560M

The Core i5-560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,894 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

Both the Core M-5Y10c and Core i5-560M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10c versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-560M — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-560M (base: 0.8 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core M-5Y10c uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-560M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y10c scores 1,906 against the Core i5-560M's 1,894 — a 0.6% lead for the Core M-5Y10c. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10c vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-560M.

FeatureCore M-5Y10cCore i5-560M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.2 GHz+60%
Base Clock
0.8 GHz
2.66 GHz+233%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-Y (2014)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,906
1,894
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
950
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core M-5Y10c uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-560M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core M-5Y10c supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core M-5Y10c) vs 16 (Core i5-560M) — the Core i5-560M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore M-5Y10cCore i5-560M
Socket
FCBGA1234
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1600
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 5300 (Core M-5Y10c) and Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Core i5-560M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core M-5Y10c targets Mobile, Core i5-560M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-560M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.

FeatureCore M-5Y10cCore i5-560M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 5300
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core M-5Y10c launched at $281 MSRP, while the Core i5-560M debuted at $225.

FeatureCore M-5Y10cCore i5-560M
MSRP
$281
$225-20%
Avg Price (30d)
$281
Release Date
2014
2010