Core M-5Y10c vs Core M-5Y70

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core M-5Y10c vs Core M-5Y70 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core M-5Y10c vs Core M-5Y70: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core M-5Y10c

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 5300, while Core M-5Y70 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core M-5Y70

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,890 vs 1,906).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core M-5Y10c can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core M-5Y10c better than Core M-5Y70?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core M-5Y70 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y10c pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y10c is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core M-5Y10c is the better buy right now. Core M-5Y10c comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $281 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core M-5Y70 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.8% better value on MSRP (6.8 vs 6.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y10c makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core M-5Y10c vs Core M-5Y70 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core M-5Y10c

The Core M-5Y10c is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $281.

Core M-5Y70

The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core M-5Y10c and Core M-5Y70 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10c versus 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y70 (base: 0.8 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). Both are built on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core M-5Y10c scores 1,906 against the Core M-5Y70's 1,890 — a 0.8% lead for the Core M-5Y10c. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core M-5Y10c	Core M-5Y70
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
Base Clock	0.8 GHz	1.1 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-Y (2014)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	1,906	1,890

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1234 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core M-5Y10c	Core M-5Y70
Socket	FCBGA1234	FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core M-5Y10c) / not specified (Core M-5Y70). The Core M-5Y10c includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 5300), while the Core M-5Y70 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core M-5Y10c targets Mobile.

Feature	Core M-5Y10c	Core M-5Y70
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 5300	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core M-5Y10c was priced at $281, while the Core M-5Y70 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($281 vs $281), Core M-5Y70 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y10c delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y70 — making the Core M-5Y10c the 0.8% better value option.

Feature	Core M-5Y10c	Core M-5Y70
MSRP	$281	$281
Performance per Dollar	6.8+1%	6.7
Release Date	2014	2014

Search Core M-5Y10c on Amazon

Search Core M-5Y70 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.