Core Ultra 5 125U vs Core Ultra 5 228V

Intel

Core Ultra 5 125U

12 Cores14 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 228V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 125U

2023

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Core Ultra 5 125U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (16,955 vs 17,152).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $295 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 125U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 228V better than Core Ultra 5 125U?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 5 228V is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 125U pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Core Ultra 5 125U also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 125U is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 14 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 228V is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 5 228V is at an unclear MSRP at $295 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core Ultra 5 125U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (57.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 228V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 125UCore Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low181 FPS180 FPS
medium145 FPS145 FPS
high117 FPS117 FPS
ultra96 FPS97 FPS
1440p
low147 FPS148 FPS
medium116 FPS117 FPS
high93 FPS95 FPS
ultra76 FPS79 FPS
4K
low79 FPS83 FPS
medium67 FPS71 FPS
high54 FPS57 FPS
ultra42 FPS44 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 125UCore Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low181 FPS212 FPS
medium153 FPS176 FPS
high140 FPS158 FPS
ultra123 FPS139 FPS
1440p
low160 FPS181 FPS
medium139 FPS154 FPS
high129 FPS142 FPS
ultra111 FPS122 FPS
4K
low131 FPS137 FPS
medium117 FPS122 FPS
high110 FPS115 FPS
ultra95 FPS100 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 5 125UCore Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low429 FPS424 FPS
medium429 FPS424 FPS
high429 FPS424 FPS
ultra429 FPS424 FPS
1440p
low429 FPS424 FPS
medium429 FPS424 FPS
high429 FPS424 FPS
ultra413 FPS424 FPS
4K
low429 FPS424 FPS
medium380 FPS384 FPS
high331 FPS343 FPS
ultra265 FPS272 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 5 125UCore Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low429 FPS424 FPS
medium429 FPS424 FPS
high429 FPS424 FPS
ultra429 FPS424 FPS
1440p
low429 FPS424 FPS
medium429 FPS424 FPS
high429 FPS424 FPS
ultra429 FPS424 FPS
4K
low429 FPS424 FPS
medium429 FPS424 FPS
high417 FPS424 FPS
ultra364 FPS408 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 125U and Core Ultra 5 228V

Intel

Core Ultra 5 125U

The Core Ultra 5 125U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,152 points. Launch price was $363.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 228V

The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 125U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 228V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 5 125U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 125U versus 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 125U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 125U scores 17,152 against the Core Ultra 5 228V's 16,955 — a 1.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 125U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 125U vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 125UCore Ultra 5 228V
Cores / Threads
12 / 14+50%
8 / 8
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz+5%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
2.1 GHz+62%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+25%
Process
7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
17,152+1%
16,955
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,932
Geekbench 6 Single
2,585
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,053
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 125U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 125UCore Ultra 5 228V
Socket
FCBGA2049
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 125U) / Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Core Ultra 5 125U requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 125UCore Ultra 5 228V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 130V
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes