
Core Ultra 5 125U

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Core Ultra 5 125U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 125U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 125U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 125U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core Ultra 5 125U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,959 vs 17,152).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 125U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 125U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X better than Core Ultra 5 125U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 125U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 125U
The Core Ultra 5 125U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,152 points. Launch price was $363.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 125U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 125U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 125U versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 125U (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 125U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 125U scores 17,152 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 1.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 125U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 125U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 125U | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+5% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+177% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-P (2023) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,152+1% | 16,959 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,255 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,243 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 125U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 125U | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 125U) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 125U | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












