
Core Ultra 5 235HX

Xeon 6505P
Core Ultra 5 235HX vs Xeon 6505P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 235HX vs Xeon 6505P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 235HX vs Xeon 6505P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 235HX
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (48EU), while Xeon 6505P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 48 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6505P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- βNo AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon 6505P
2025Why buy it
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (39,341 vs 40,122).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $563 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 235HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 235HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 235HX better than Xeon 6505P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 235HX vs Xeon 6505P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 235HX
The Core Ultra 5 235HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,122 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon 6505P
The Xeon 6505P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024β2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 39,341 points. Launch price was $563.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 235HX packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon 6505P offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Core Ultra 5 235HX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235HX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6505P β a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235HX (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 235HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon 6505P uses Granite Rapids (2024β2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 40,122 against the Xeon 6505P's 39,341 β a 2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235HX. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 235HX vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6505P.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235HX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+24% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+32% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 48 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+50% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) | Granite Rapids (2024β2025) |
| PassMark | 40,122+2% | 39,341 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,677 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,600 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,000 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 235HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6505P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6505P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB β 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 235HX) vs 8 (Xeon 6505P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 5 235HX) vs 88 (Xeon 6505P) β the Xeon 6505P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 5 235HX) and LGA4710 (Xeon 6505P).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235HX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 235HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6505P supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 235HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (48EU)), while the Xeon 6505P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235HX targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Xeon 6505P rivals EPYC 9334.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235HX | Xeon 6505P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (48EU) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Laptop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














