Core Ultra 7 266V
VS
Ryzen 5 6600HS

Core Ultra 7 266V vs Ryzen 5 6600HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 266V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 5 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 6600HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 266V

#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
112%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
108%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
105%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
104%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
104%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
100%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
91%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 7 266V delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 5 6600HS in both compute-intensive tasks (1.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Ultra 7 266VRyzen 5 6600HS
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($520)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) / 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 7 266VRyzen 5 6600HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($520)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 5 6600HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 266V

The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 6600HS

The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 266V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 6600HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 266V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 266V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 266V scores 19,274 against the Ryzen 5 6600HS's 18,975 — a 1.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 266V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 266V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 266VRyzen 5 6600HS
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
5 GHz+11%
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
512K (per core)
Process
3 nm-50%
6 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
19,274+2%
18,975
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 266VRyzen 5 6600HS
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0