Core Ultra 7 266V vs Ryzen 7 7445HS

Core Ultra 7 266V vs Ryzen 7 7445HS Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 7 266V

8 / 8

19,274

+1.4%

Core i5-11300H

Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition

19,008

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 266V vs Ryzen 7 7445HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 266V vs Ryzen 7 7445HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 266V

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP7r2 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 7 7445HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 266V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,008 vs 19,274).
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
❌Older platform position on FP7/FP7r2, while Core Ultra 7 266V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 266V better than Ryzen 7 7445HS?

Yes. Core Ultra 7 266V is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 266V is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 266V is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 266V is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 7 266V comes in at an unclear MSRP at $520 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 266V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of FP7/FP7r2, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 7 266V vs Ryzen 7 7445HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 266V

The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 7445HS

The Ryzen 7 7445HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 19,008 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 266V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7445HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 266V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7445HS — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 266V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 266V scores 19,274 against the Ryzen 7 7445HS's 19,008 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 266V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 266V vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7445HS.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 266V	Ryzen 7 7445HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5 GHz+6%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.2 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB+33%
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)	6 MB+140%
Process	3 nm-25%	4 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark	19,274+1%	19,008

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.