Core Ultra 9 285
Ryzen 5 5600
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 5600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 5600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 9 285
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 97.5 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($589 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $390 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core Ultra 9 285.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 285 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 40,000).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 9 285 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 285 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 285 better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 5600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 9 285
The Core Ultra 9 285 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 57,442 points. Launch price was $579.
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285 packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285 scores 57,442 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 90.9% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 40,000 vs 11,077 (113.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,000 vs 2,052, a 37.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 8,600 (79.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+25% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+16967% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 57,442+167% | 21,550 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,000+261% | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000+46% | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000+133% | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the Core Ultra 9 285 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 800 Series (Core Ultra 9 285) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Core Ultra 9 285) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). The Core Ultra 9 285 includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285 targets High-End Gaming, Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-End Gaming | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 9 285 was priced at $589, while the Ryzen 5 5600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($589 vs $199), Ryzen 5 5600 was $390 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 285 delivers 97.5 pts/$ vs 108.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 10.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $589 | $199-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.5 | 108.3+11% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 285 and Ryzen 5 5600
