Core Ultra 9 285
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 9 285
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($589 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 97.5 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($589 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (56,854 vs 57,442).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.4 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($1,340 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 285 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 285 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 9 285
The Core Ultra 9 285 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 57,442 points. Launch price was $579.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 56,854 points. Launch price was $2,000.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285 packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — a 1.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285 scores 57,442 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX's 56,854 — a 1% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24+100% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+2% | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+88% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 57,442+1% | 56,854 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 285) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 285) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 800 Series (Core Ultra 9 285) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core Ultra 9 285) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX). The Core Ultra 9 285 includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285 targets High-End Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX rivals Xeon w7-3545.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-End Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 9 285 was priced at $589, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX came in at $1340. On launch pricing ($589 vs $1340), Core Ultra 9 285 was $751 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 285 delivers 97.5 pts/$ vs 42.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — making the Core Ultra 9 285 the 78.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $589-56% | $1340 |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.5+130% | 42.4 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 285 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
