EPYC 9555P vs EPYC 9654

AMD

EPYC 9555P

64 Cores128 Thrd360 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024
VS
AMD

EPYC 9654

96 Cores192 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022

EPYC 9555P vs EPYC 9654 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9555P vs EPYC 9654 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9555P vs EPYC 9654: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9555P

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Costs $3,822 less on MSRP ($7,983 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 68.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).

EPYC 9654

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,000 vs 29,406).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($11,805 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9555P better than EPYC 9654?
Yes. EPYC 9555P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 47% better Geekbench multi-core, 13.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9555P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9555P is the stronger fit. You are getting 47% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9555P is the better buy right now. EPYC 9555P comes in $3,822 cheaper on MSRP at $7,983 MSRP versus $11,805 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 68.0% better value on MSRP (17.0 vs 10.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9555P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 96/192. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9555P vs EPYC 9654 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9555P

The EPYC 9555P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,441 points. Launch price was $7,983.

AMD

EPYC 9654

The EPYC 9654 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022βˆ’2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 119,246 points. Launch price was $11,805.

⚑

Processing Power

The EPYC 9555P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9654 offers 96 cores / 192 threads β€” the EPYC 9654 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555P versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654 β€” a 17.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9555P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9555P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9654 uses Genoa (2022βˆ’2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555P scores 135,441 against the EPYC 9654's 119,246 β€” a 12.7% lead for the EPYC 9555P. Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 2,815 vs 1,250, a 77% lead for the EPYC 9555P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,406 vs 20,000 (38.1% advantage for the EPYC 9555P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555P vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654.

FeatureEPYC 9555PEPYC 9654
Cores / Threads
64 / 128
96 / 192+50%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+19%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+33%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
384 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-20%
5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Genoa (2022βˆ’2023)
PassMark
135,441+14%
119,246
Geekbench 6 Single
2,815+125%
1,250
Geekbench 6 Multi
29,406+47%
20,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9555P versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9654 β€” the EPYC 9555P supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555P) and SP5 (EPYC 9654).

FeatureEPYC 9555PEPYC 9654
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000+25%
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9555P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9654 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555P rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9654 rivals Xeon 8592+.

FeatureEPYC 9555PEPYC 9654
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center / Single Socket
Data Center
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9555P was priced at $7983, while the EPYC 9654 came in at $11805. On launch pricing ($7983 vs $11805), EPYC 9555P was $3822 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555P delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 10.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9654 β€” making the EPYC 9555P the 50.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9555PEPYC 9654
MSRP
$7983-32%
$11805
Performance per Dollar
17.0+68%
10.1
Release Date
2024
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.