Pentium 957
VS
Athlon II X2 240e

Pentium 957 vs Athlon II X2 240e

Intel

Pentium 957

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 240e

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 957 is positioned at rank 1146 and the Athlon II X2 240e is on rank 941, so the Athlon II X2 240e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 957

#1134
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3876%
#1135
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3819%
#1136
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3506%
#1137
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3490%
#1138
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3458%
#1140
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3339%
#1141
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3202%
#1142
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3197%
#1143
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3111%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
100%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
97%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
95%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
95%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
94%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 240e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23831%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22518%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16350%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4926%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3902%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3413%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1955%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1929%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1757%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1757%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1737%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1690%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1666%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1660%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1645%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
100%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#944
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
100%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
98%
#947
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#948
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
97%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
96%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
96%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
96%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
96%
#954
Core i5-660
MSRP: $196|Avg: $150
95%
#955
Athlon II X2 250
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
95%
#956
Core i3-2120T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $38
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X2 240e leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 957 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium 957Athlon II X2 240e
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium 957 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 87% cheaper ($10 vs $77) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium 957Athlon II X2 240e
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+676%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 957 and Athlon II X2 240e

Intel

Pentium 957

The Pentium 957 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $134.

AMD

Athlon II X2 240e

The Athlon II X2 240e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $35.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 957 and Athlon II X2 240e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Pentium 957 versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240e — a 80% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240e (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium 957 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 240e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 957 scores 1,015 against the Athlon II X2 240e's 1,007 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium 957. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 957 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 240e.

FeaturePentium 957Athlon II X2 240e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+133%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+133%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,015
1,007
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 957 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 240e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 957Athlon II X2 240e
Socket
BGA1023
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium 957) / true (Athlon II X2 240e). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240e rivals Pentium E5400.

FeaturePentium 957Athlon II X2 240e
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium 957 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 240e debuted at $77. At current prices ($10 vs $77), the Pentium 957 is $67 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium 957 delivers 101.5 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 240e — making the Pentium 957 the 154.3% better value option.

FeaturePentium 957Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP
$134
$77-43%
Avg Price (30d)
$10-87%
$77
Performance per Dollar
101.5+675%
13.1
Release Date
2011
2009