Pentium 957
VS
E1-6010

Pentium 957 vs E1-6010

Intel

Pentium 957

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2011
VS
AMD

E1-6010

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.35 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 957 is positioned at rank 1146 and the E1-6010 is on rank 878, so the E1-6010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 957

#1134
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3876%
#1135
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3819%
#1136
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3506%
#1137
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3490%
#1138
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3458%
#1140
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3339%
#1141
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3202%
#1142
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3197%
#1143
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3111%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
100%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
97%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
95%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
95%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
94%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E1-6010

#866
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1458%
#867
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1437%
#868
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1319%
#869
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1313%
#870
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1301%
#872
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1256%
#873
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1205%
#874
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1203%
#875
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1170%
#878
E1-6010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#881
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
98%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
97%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The E1-6010 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 957 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium 957E1-6010
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium 957E1-6010
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 957 and E1-6010

Intel

Pentium 957

The Pentium 957 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $134.

AMD

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 957 and E1-6010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Pentium 957 versus 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the E1-6010. The Pentium 957 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the E1-6010 uses Beema (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 957 scores 1,015 against the E1-6010's 1,006 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium 957.

FeaturePentium 957E1-6010
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
1.35 GHz+13%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1024 kB+300%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Beema (2014)
PassMark
1,015
1,006
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 957 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E1-6010 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 957E1-6010
Socket
BGA1023
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%