Pentium Extreme Edition 955 vs Celeron E3200
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
Celeron E3200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Extreme Edition 955 is positioned at rank 1123 and the Celeron E3200 is on rank 683, so the Celeron E3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium Extreme Edition 955
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium Extreme Edition 955 | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Presler (2005−2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium Extreme Edition 955 | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+895%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Extreme Edition 955 and Celeron E3200
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
The Pentium Extreme Edition 955 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2005 (19 years ago). It is based on the Presler (2005−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.466 GHz, with boost up to 0.47 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,095 points. Launch price was $999.
Celeron E3200
The Celeron E3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,090 points. Launch price was $52.
Processing Power
The Pentium Extreme Edition 955 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron E3200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.47 GHz on the Pentium Extreme Edition 955 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E3200 — a 134.5% clock advantage for the Celeron E3200 (base: 3.466 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Pentium Extreme Edition 955 uses the Presler (2005−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron E3200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Extreme Edition 955 scores 1,095 against the Celeron E3200's 1,090 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium Extreme Edition 955.
| Feature | Pentium Extreme Edition 955 | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.47 GHz | 2.4 GHz+411% |
| Base Clock | 3.466 GHz+44% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (total) |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Presler (2005−2007) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,095 | 1,090 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 340 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 610 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1.
| Feature | Pentium Extreme Edition 955 | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pentium Extreme Edition 955) / VT-x (Celeron E3200). Primary use case: Celeron E3200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3200 rivals Pentium E5200.
| Feature | Pentium Extreme Edition 955 | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Pentium Extreme Edition 955 launched at $999 MSRP, while the Celeron E3200 debuted at $43. At current prices ($50 vs $5), the Celeron E3200 is $45 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium Extreme Edition 955 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 218.0 pts/$ for the Celeron E3200 — making the Celeron E3200 the 163.5% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium Extreme Edition 955 | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $43-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $5-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 218.0+895% |
| Release Date | 2005 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium Extreme Edition 955 and Celeron E3200
