Pentium J4205
VS
Core m5-6Y54

Pentium J4205 vs Core m5-6Y54

Intel

Pentium J4205

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core m5-6Y54

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium J4205 is positioned at rank 910 and the Core m5-6Y54 is on rank 1132, so the Pentium J4205 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium J4205

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21677%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20483%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14872%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4480%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3549%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3105%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1778%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1755%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1598%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1598%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1580%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1537%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1516%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1510%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1496%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
97%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
100%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
99%
#913
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
99%
#914
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
99%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
98%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
98%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
97%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
97%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
97%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
97%
#924
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
95%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y54

#1120
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3596%
#1121
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3543%
#1122
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3252%
#1123
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3238%
#1124
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3208%
#1126
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3098%
#1127
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2971%
#1128
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2966%
#1129
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2886%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
95%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
94%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
94%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
93%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
93%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core m5-6Y54 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium J4205 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium J4205Core m5-6Y54
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($161)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium J4205 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 43% cheaper ($161 vs $281) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium J4205Core m5-6Y54
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+76%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($161)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium J4205 and Core m5-6Y54

Intel

Pentium J4205

The Pentium J4205 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,315 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Core m5-6Y54

The Core m5-6Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,294 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Pentium J4205 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m5-6Y54 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J4205 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Pentium J4205 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core m5-6Y54 — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core m5-6Y54 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Pentium J4205 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m5-6Y54 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium J4205 scores 2,315 against the Core m5-6Y54's 2,294 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium J4205. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium J4205 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y54.

FeaturePentium J4205Core m5-6Y54
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz+4%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz+36%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark
2,315
2,294
Geekbench 6 Single
875
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,648
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium J4205 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m5-6Y54 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium J4205Core m5-6Y54
Socket
FCBGA1296
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium J4205) / VT-x, VT-d (Core m5-6Y54). The Core m5-6Y54 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 515), while the Pentium J4205 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m5-6Y54 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core m5-6Y54 rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y.

FeaturePentium J4205Core m5-6Y54
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 515
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Enthusiast
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium J4205 launched at $161 MSRP, while the Core m5-6Y54 debuted at $281. At current prices ($161 vs $281), the Pentium J4205 is $120 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium J4205 delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Core m5-6Y54 — making the Pentium J4205 the 55.1% better value option.

FeaturePentium J4205Core m5-6Y54
MSRP
$161-43%
$281
Avg Price (30d)
$161-43%
$281
Performance per Dollar
14.4+76%
8.2
Release Date
2016
2015