Pentium SU4100
VS
Celeron B720

Pentium SU4100 vs Celeron B720

Intel

Pentium SU4100

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron B720

1 Cores1 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium SU4100 is positioned at rank 1235 and the Celeron B720 is on rank 1091, so the Celeron B720 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium SU4100

#1223
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
12380%
#1224
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
12198%
#1225
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
11198%
#1226
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
11148%
#1227
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
11046%
#1229
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
10667%
#1230
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
10228%
#1231
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
10211%
#1232
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
9937%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
100%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
90%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
87%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
86%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
78%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B720

#1078
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3088%
#1079
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3043%
#1080
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2794%
#1081
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2781%
#1082
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2756%
#1084
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2661%
#1085
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2552%
#1086
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2547%
#1087
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2479%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1092
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1093
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1095
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1097
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1098
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1099
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1100
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1103
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1104
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron B720 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium SU4100 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium SU4100Celeron B720
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron B720 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 33% cheaper ($10 vs $15) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium SU4100Celeron B720
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+46%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium SU4100 and Celeron B720

Intel

Pentium SU4100

The Pentium SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron B720

The Celeron B720 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Pentium SU4100 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron B720 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium SU4100 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU4100 versus 1.7 GHz on the Celeron B720 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Celeron B720 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Pentium SU4100 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron B720 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium SU4100 scores 685 against the Celeron B720's 665 — a 3% lead for the Pentium SU4100. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium SU4100 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B720.

FeaturePentium SU4100Celeron B720
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
1.7 GHz+31%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
1.7 GHz+31%
L3 Cache
0 kB
1.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
685+3%
665
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium SU4100 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron B720 uses G2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium SU4100Celeron B720
Socket
BGA956
G2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium SU4100) / VT-x (Celeron B720). The Celeron B720 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium SU4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B720 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B720 rivals Pentium 967.

FeaturePentium SU4100Celeron B720
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium SU4100 launched at $289 MSRP, while the Celeron B720 debuted at $70. At current prices ($15 vs $10), the Celeron B720 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium SU4100 delivers 45.7 pts/$ vs 66.5 pts/$ for the Celeron B720 — making the Celeron B720 the 37.1% better value option.

FeaturePentium SU4100Celeron B720
MSRP
$289
$70-76%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$10-33%
Performance per Dollar
45.7
66.5+46%
Release Date
2009
2012