Phenom II X4 805
VS
Celeron N3450

Phenom II X4 805 vs Celeron N3450

AMD

Phenom II X4 805

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron N3450

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 805 is positioned at rank 317 and the Celeron N3450 is on rank 122, so the Celeron N3450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 805

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4673%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4416%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3206%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
966%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
765%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
669%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
383%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
378%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
344%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
344%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
341%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
331%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
327%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
325%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
323%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
100%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
99%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
99%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
99%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
99%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
99%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
99%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
99%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
99%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
97%
#317
Phenom II X4 805
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N3450

#110
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
296%
#111
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
292%
#112
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
268%
#113
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
267%
#114
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
264%
#116
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
255%
#117
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
245%
#118
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
244%
#119
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
238%
#122
Celeron N3450
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#126
Celeron N4000
MSRP: $107|Avg: $30
99%
#137
N200
MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N3450 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPhenom II X4 805Celeron N3450
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X4 805 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPhenom II X4 805Celeron N3450
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 805 and Celeron N3450

AMD

Phenom II X4 805

The Phenom II X4 805 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,001 points. Launch price was $174.

Intel

Celeron N3450

The Celeron N3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,981 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Phenom II X4 805 and Celeron N3450 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Phenom II X4 805 versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron N3450 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 805 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Phenom II X4 805 uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron N3450 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 805 scores 2,001 against the Celeron N3450's 1,981 — a 1% lead for the Phenom II X4 805. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 805 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N3450.

FeaturePhenom II X4 805Celeron N3450
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+14%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+127%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Deneb (2009−2011)
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark
2,001+1%
1,981
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 805 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N3450 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X4 805Celeron N3450
Socket
AM3
FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
2400
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X4 805) / true (Celeron N3450). The Celeron N3450 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Phenom II X4 805 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3450 rivals AMD A4-9120.

FeaturePhenom II X4 805Celeron N3450
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true