Phenom II X4 N950 vs Xeon D-1602

Phenom II X4 N950 vs Xeon D-1602 Performance Spectrum

Phenom II X4 N950

4 / 4

2,485

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon D-1602

2 / 4

2,459

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Phenom II X4 N950 vs Xeon D-1602 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Phenom II X4 N950 vs Xeon D-1602: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Phenom II X4 N950

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 27W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon D-1602

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X4 N950 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,459 vs 2,485).
❌1250% higher power demand at 27W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X4 N950 better than Xeon D-1602?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1602 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Phenom II X4 N950 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X4 N950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 N950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X4 N950 still makes the most sense overall. Phenom II X4 N950 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1602 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Phenom II X4 N950 vs Xeon D-1602 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Phenom II X4 N950

The Phenom II X4 N950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,485 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1602

The Xeon D-1602 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,459 points. Launch price was $106.

⚡

Processing Power

The Phenom II X4 N950 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon D-1602 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 N950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Phenom II X4 N950 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1602 — a 41.5% clock advantage for the Xeon D-1602. The Phenom II X4 N950 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon D-1602 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 N950 scores 2,485 against the Xeon D-1602's 2,459 — a 1.1% lead for the Phenom II X4 N950.

Feature	Phenom II X4 N950	Xeon D-1602
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	2,485+1%	2,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 N950 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon D-1602 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.